Thursday, November 13, 2014

Week 12 Reading Response

Herrrrre we go!

Now, this list relates to my own personal thoughts if I were to do a presentation in a classroom today. As I don't have to plan anything or actually have teaching responsibilities, I imagine my listing differs from others.

To promote creativity and self-expression
To strengthen student’s ability to resist the negative messages present in mass media, digital media, and popular culture about violence, materialism, stereotypes, and sexuality
To increase student motivation and engagement in the classroom
To strengthen discrimination skills in distinguishing between high-quality and low-quality messages
To build students’ ability to be active, thoughtful “readers” or interpreters of the media messages in their cultural environment
To help students use their own voices for advocacy and social change
To increase students’ knowledge of the mass media in society
To improve students’ writing and communication skills by enabling them to use a wide range of message forms, symbol systems, and technologies
To develop students’ skills in using digital technology tools
To promote appreciation for locally produced media and respect for diverse cultures
To build students’ appreciation for the function of journalism, news, and of the media messages in their cultural environment
To build appreciation for film and visual media as an art form
To support the development of student’s content knowledge
To modernize the curriculum and make it more relevant to students

“When I shard my concerns with my then 17 year old daughter, Rachel, she said, “Mom, I’m so glad our school doesn’t allow us to use Facebook in school.  I am totally in favor of internet filtering in school. Without it, I would never be able to get any homework done.”  Pg 179


You know, I’m thinking about this and the use of personal media while in school, all the while I am currently sitting in a high school lunchroom on the eastern panhandle of WV.  I see students at different points of their day – after school, during lunch, during class, in between classes, etc.  In regards to my experience, I’d like to share an observation I’ve made about students and cell phone usage.
I often present kids with broad, abstract, or uncomfortable questions, because I want them to be uncomfortable. Students hear the bullshit college spiel all of the time, talking about financial aid, small class sizes, finding success, blah blah blah.  I try to be real, I ask students about student loans, about parties, and the true pros and cons when comparing different types of schools.
Most schools either ban or severely limit cell phone usage during school and class hours. Something I’ve noticed in the schools that do not is that, when presented with an uncertain situation, students that can access their cell phone do immediately as a way to, in my mind, escape the question. By grabbing at their phone, it is an easy way to deflect the uncertainty and duck out of the question,  rather than making eye contact or perhaps answering a question that they aren’t sure they know the answer to.  Students that cannot access their cell phones often attempt something similar, but it is easier to direct a student who eyes are down on a paper rather than glued to a cell phone screen, in my opinion.
 I’ll be honest, I see adults do this in regular conversation all the time as well. Isn’t this a habit that should be curbed? I don’t believe it is healthy, productive, or educationally sound to develop a habit where, in any situation where you feel stress or determine the thing in question is something you cannot ascertain, you feel you can immediately withdraw from the conversation by using your cell phone to create a “privacy bubble,” of sorts.



“In other schools, there is a blanket rule: no R-rated films can be screened.” (pg 181)

In a fit of conceitedness, I am going to reference my own video, posted last week for the PSA assignment. I created the video with teenagers as a target audience, and I purposefully used the words “dick” and “bitch” in it. Let me ask you: what exactly would I be exposing teenagers to that they already are not exposed to on a grand scale every single day? Let us take these same observations and apply them to media used in the classroom. What are we trying to protect students from? We have all been adolescents, we have all gone through that incredibly colorful period of teenage angst, and we all know that it isn’t freshly scrubbed and smelling of lemons. It is a combination of every emotion and every scene you can think of: sex, anger, violence, depression, nudity, life, death, love, hate, everything.
And we know this. Yet, for some reason, we try to hold on to this slim fragment of our imagination that if something occurs in the classroom, it must represent this white glove pinesol view of learning. Teens can’t see a woman’s breasts in a movie, god forbid! That doesn’t promote learning and might incite a riot.
What about the alternative? What if we embraced what the teens are going through (because, like I said, we went through it to) and instead curbed the media to speak the language and life that the audience knows? Wouldn’t that make it more relevant? Last time I checked, my teenage years weren’t a rerun of Leave it to Beaver.



“…we must confront our own biases, prerconceptions, stereotypes, and low expectations as we discover the capacities and talents of studnets who are struggling with school but who may have considerable competency at other at other skills” (pg 184). 

As I have referenced in previous blog postings, I often come across students who find themselves destined for college majors that they have absolutely no fit with, being driven towards preselected areas by parents, teachers, peers, our counselors.  Part of my job, or at least how I interpret it, is to make sure students are entering majors appropriate for their interest and skill levels.  Based on my conversations with other admissions counselors, I’m in the minority in helping students in this regard.
I think this is something that media can help with. Student media projects that aim to discover more on career areas, college majors, or particular jobs, can help take the veneer off of certain areas that a student might be interested in. I’m not talking about the shitty “look at the occupational outlook handbook and find a major” project that ends up with everyone becoming lawyers, doctors, and computer scientists, but real work exploring the who, how, and what. Maybe something like this will help students realize that if they freaking hate math, they shouldn’t do computer science. If they don’t like blood or science, maybe they shouldn’t do pre-med.  And I’m not saying that we should dissuade students from their dreams. If a student truly does have a passion for a certain area or subject, then an appropriately led project should serve as a fuel for that passion, not as a discouragement.  

3 comments:

  1. I totally agree with your thoughts on cell phones as deflectors and teen years as not resembling Leave it to Beaver. I think my childhood might have been closer to Roseanne, ha! I also agree that we, as adults, use our smart phones as our little safety bubble where no one can see us. I am guilty of reading something on my phone and completely blocking out/forgetting that I am in public. . . especially on the Kindle app! I was just browsing facebook and saw where they had put tiny dots over Kim Kardashian's nipples and other areas, because why? I mean, the rest of her breasts are exposed, so what's the point in just covering the nipple? I don't know, i have a hard time understanding this place.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The “privacy bubble” is hilarious, but accurate. Kids and adults do this as avoidance absolutely, but we also need to be aware that it is plain rude when we are interacting with people. Making them feel they are less interesting or beneath or full attention. When did we become so rude and self obsessed? The answer varies, but I find people do this less if they are restricted at home. The concept of “no devices at dinner.” Family time is just that. Not on our devices avoiding real family interactions and prioritizing these alternative egos we carry on our social media sites. I have strong opinions about “how much is too much” with phone usage and have begin to reflect constantly on my own behavior and adjusting more harshly to be sure I never come across this way. I want to give real people my full attention and consideration. Nothing replaces real interactions. Nice points Corey, thanks for the reflection!
    I also agree to us keeping kids too protected, but it is hard to draw a line in the classroom. School-appropriate is a hot button topic and can be a very gray area. I have slipped up now and then with light language, but students usually laugh and shake it off. It is sad that I feel so terrible for saying damnit instead of darnit. We have become a bit extreme in schools about this. Kids have seen and heard WAY worse in many cases. But this is not our decision to make, it falls on what parents deem acceptable, right?! I don’t know that answer that’s for sure.

    Your third quote is spot on with my interpretation as well. Too many kids are influenced in the wrong path by others, so they end up in college way too long or end up in a career they hate. I have a very wishy washy attitude and enjoy change, so I think I’d be unhappy to a degree in whatever career or path I chose, but one can focus on positive outcomes of their job and have that fuel them in other ways and I do lots of different things in my personal life to spice up my life more. I positively channel my need for new explorations with travel as well.

    I think you are on the right track by having students do more deep soul searching into their personal interests rather than I wanna do this to make a bunch of money, lol. Don’t we all! Finding a career that is right for you is very important. Thanks for your commitment to them! Well done and thanks for the ponderings. Happy Thanksgiving!

    ReplyDelete
  3. I love your stance on the second quote. I realized that when I was in high school, we watched a version of Romeo and Juliette in my English class that contained nudity. I don't think that would fly nowadays. I get increasingly frustrated in my clinical placement because of the heavy restrictions placed on media in the classroom. At my school, teachers must have written permission to show any type of media to students. This really seems to hamper the teacher's ability to incorporate relevant news and media into lessons. Sometimes, that stuff just happens as we go and can't be planned for. It seems the administration is trying to protect the kids and hold teachers accountable, but couldn't they find a better way? I hardly see any teachers using media to teach students at the school, and I know it has a lot to do with the restrictions. This seems to also be relevant when it comes to the actual content and rating. Like you said, adolescence is messy and filled with all kinds of charged topics, so why should we not be able to mirror real life through relevant media?

    ReplyDelete